The Birkhoff orthogonality in pre-Hilbert C^∗-modules

Linear Orthogonality Preservers of Hilbert C∗-modules

We show in this paper that the module structure and the orthogonality structure of a Hilbert C∗-module determine its inner product structure. Let A be a C∗-algebra, and E and F be Hilbert A-modules. Assume Φ : E → F is an A-module map satisfying 〈Φ(x),Φ(y)〉A = 0 whenever 〈x, y〉A = 0. Then Φ is automatically bounded. In case Φ is bijective, E is isomorphic to F . More precisely, let JE be the cl...

Chebyshev Centers and Approximation in Pre-Hilbert C*-Modules

On Approximate Birkhoff-James Orthogonality and Approximate $ast$-orthogonality in $C^ast$-algebras

We offer a new definition of $varepsilon$-orthogonality in normed spaces, and we try to explain some properties of which. Also we introduce some types of $varepsilon$-orthogonality in an arbitrary  $C^ast$-algebra $mathcal{A}$, as a Hilbert $C^ast$-module over itself, and investigate some of its properties in such spaces. We state some results relating range-kernel orthogonality in $C^*$-algebras.

Linear Orthogonality Preservers of Hilbert Modules

We verify in this paper that the linearity and orthogonality structures of a (not necessarily local trivial) Hilbert bundle over a locally compact Hausdorff space Ω determine its unitary structure. In fact, as Hilbert bundles over Ω are exactly Hilbert C0(Ω)-modules, we have a more general set up. A C-linear map θ (not assumed to be bounded) between two Hilbert C∗-modules is said to be “orthogo...

chebyshev centers and approximation in pre-hilbert c*-modules